I was at a hot place last week (in two meanings - weather and politics) and therefore had no chance to see what's going on with streber. But I like to see and it proves my experience once again that "it's the sound which makes the music" (simply translated a German saying here) - meaning to be happy to see that obviously @guest was kind of misunderstood due to his/her words chosen, but at the end she/he correctly asses streber to be a very good open source project.

Anyway I had also some discussions with a working colleague about what a pm tool needs and why he better shouldn't start writing his own solution, even this would enable him to get every feature he wants (but not so sure whether he REALLY needs). He still would be in initial stage with it wasting valuable time just for its self-assertion instead of the project he's responsible for.

Actually getting streber work for you takes some time as it is with every other program, but one can effectively use it for most of the tasks without needing a reference manual. And one should look at what is presented on screen - thanks to streber's very nice styled UI important information is just where you exepect it (at least after thinking twice) or then not more than one or two mouse clicks away.

About the technologies used I guess they are absolutely fine. With Python there's the problem that not so many hosters provide it and (even Google seems to be partially written with it) the tab-indent for code structuring can lead to situations where a wrong editor setting can mess it all up (as learned hard by experience).

So stop writing here. It's just nice to be back in more moderate climate (in two meanings, see above...)