This page requires java-script to be enabled. Please adjust your browser-settings.
streber
PM
Login
|
Register
guest
Home
Your Tasks
Bookmarks
Efforts
Overall history
P
rojects
streber
People
Companies
S
earch:
streber
>
Tasks
|
Docu
|
Milestones
|
Versions
|
Files
|
History
Help
Community
>
Translation Gu...
> Comment
Comment
/
#4051
Edit
Bookmark
Delete
I suggested in
dates are currently not localized
to write our own implementation of gmstrftime, based on gmdate() and localization tables. That would remove the need to use setlocale() completely and would make localized dates completely portable. We just need a few more language strings (namely the names of months and weekdays, both long and short). [pixtur] rejected the idea fearing performance problems. My opinion is: if the user wants localized dates, he/she will have to pay for them. If we make them optional so that the user don't have to pay if he/she does
not
want them, I don't see the reason to worry about performances.